RE: lib-ir: Policy decision for SB collections

[Carol Hixson <chixson@darkwing.uoregon.edu>]

It could be as simple as telling them that the software
requires it. Which, really, it does - I just subverted
it.

Carol

At 03:40 PM 3/30/2005, you wrote:
>All:
>
>I, myself, like this idea of the abstract that JQ mentioned. Any sense 
>from these faculty members as to whether that would be acceptable to them?
>
>Heather B.
>
>
>>However, I don't see any problem with a faculty member uploading a file that
>>is a surrogate for the primary material.  Why couldn't Velma have created a
>>short text file that contained the abstract, and uploaded that as the
>>content with the same metadata?
>
>
>_____________________________________
>Heather Briston, JD, MSI (ARM)
>Richard and Mary Corrigan Solari University Historian and Archivist
>Knight Library
>1299 University of Oregon
>Eugene, Oregon  97403-1299
>541 346-1899
>541 345-1882 (fax)
>http://libweb.uoregon.edu/speccoll/archives/index.html