RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty

To: <lib-ir@lists.uoregon.edu>
Subject: RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
From: "JQ Johnson" <jqj@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:15:21 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.1.20030429102028.02076cc0@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Reply-to: lib-ir@lists.uoregon.edu
Sender: owner-lib-ir@lists.uoregon.edu

I think the revised version is excellent.  Anybody else have suggestions?
If not, Carol should use it as is.

I predict that this will be the basis for our talking points and
presentations throughout the pilot project phase.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-lib-ir@lists.uoregon.edu
[mailto:owner-lib-ir@lists.uoregon.edu]On Behalf Of Carol Hixson
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Institutional Repository Group
Subject: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty


Attached is a revised version of the statement
I'd like to send to Garcia-Pabon. I think I
incorporated all the points that JQ brought
up. Please let me know if it needs further revision.

Carol

Follow-Ups:
- RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
  - From: Carol Hixson <chixson@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU>
- RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
  - From: Heather Briston <hbriston@darkwing.uoregon.edu>

References:
- lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
  - From: Carol Hixson <chixson@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU>

Prev by Date: RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
Next by Date: RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
Previous by thread: RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
Next by thread: RE: lib-ir: revised statement for faculty
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread